Lewis Hamilton says finish to Italian GP introduced again Abu Dhabi reminiscences: ‘How the principles must be’

Please use Chrome browser for a extra accessible video participant


Pink Bull’s Max Verstappen wins the Italian Grand Prix because the race ends behind the Security Automotive.

Pink Bull’s Max Verstappen wins the Italian Grand Prix because the race ends behind the Security Automotive.

Lewis Hamilton admitted the ending to Sunday’s Italian GP introduced again reminiscences of his Abu Dhabi title decider towards Max Verstappen, with the Mercedes driver on this event agreeing with the Security Automotive utility.

The 2022 Italian GP was just like the 2021 Abu Dhabi GP in that there was a Security Automotive known as with few laps remaining.

At Monza, nevertheless, the race completed behind the Security Automotive – with Max Verstappen beating Charles Leclerc – whereas in Abu Dhabi, the race was incorrectly restarted with one lap remaining.

Verstappen would overtake Hamilton, on older tyres, on that ultimate lap, claiming a exceptional world championship.

Max Verstappen passes Lewis Hamilton on the final lap in Abu Dhabi to win the 2021 F1 Championship!

Please use Chrome browser for a extra accessible video participant

Max Verstappen passes Lewis Hamilton on the ultimate lap in Abu Dhabi to win the 2021 F1 Championship!

Max Verstappen passes Lewis Hamilton on the ultimate lap in Abu Dhabi to win the 2021 F1 Championship!

Hamilton, who completed fifth on Sunday, instructed Sky in Italy that he would have “liked to combat the fellows behind me” if given the prospect to restart however mentioned he in the end agreed with the end given the finale final yr.

“It at all times brings reminiscences again,” mentioned Hamilton. “That’s the guidelines the way it must be, proper?

Sky F1's Karun Chandhok explains why the Italian Grand Prix ended behind the Safety Car and the options available to the FIA in situations like these.

Please use Chrome browser for a extra accessible video participant

Sky F1’s Karun Chandhok explains why the Italian Grand Prix ended behind the Security Automotive and the choices accessible to the FIA in conditions like these.

Sky F1’s Karun Chandhok explains why the Italian Grand Prix ended behind the Security Automotive and the choices accessible to the FIA in conditions like these.

“There’s just one time within the historical past of the game the place they have not carried out the principles like that in the present day and that is the one the place it modified the results of the championship. However it’s what it’s.”

Michael Masi, who has since left System 1’s governing FIA, didn’t let some automobiles un-lap themselves in Abu Dhabi final yr, with the race restarted before it ought to have been – leaving the door open for Verstappen.

Whereas each Pink Bull and Ferrari mentioned they wished to restart Sunday’s race, FIA’s Race Director Niels Wittich, who is among the replacements for Masi, accurately utilized the principles.

“I believe this time they adopted the principles,” Mercedes boss Toto Wolff instructed Sky Sports activities F1. “Possibly they might have carried out it a lap sooner, they usually accepted the race ends below the Security Automotive.

“That is the way it must be.”

What occurred at Monza and why followers had been denied finale

Verstappen was cruising in the direction of his fifth win in a row – 16 seconds forward of the two-stopping Charles Leclerc – when Daniel Ricciardo floor to a halt in his McLaren on Lap 47 of 53, stopping his automotive in between the Lesmos.

Whereas yellow flags had been instantly waved, there was a slight delay earlier than a Security Automotive interval was signalled.

Ferrari boss Mattia Binotto was unhappy with the FIA's implementation of the Safety Car regulations in the final stages of the race.

Please use Chrome browser for a extra accessible video participant

Ferrari boss Mattia Binotto was sad with the FIA’s implementation of the Security Automotive laws within the ultimate levels of the race.

Ferrari boss Mattia Binotto was sad with the FIA’s implementation of the Security Automotive laws within the ultimate levels of the race.

Nonetheless, Verstappen and Leclerc adopted a lot of their rivals into the pits on the next lap, becoming mushy tyres as groups anticipated the race to get below means once more shortly for an epic finale.

Nonetheless, beneficial time was wasted when the Security Automotive got here out in entrance of George Russell’s automotive, in third, and never Verstappen. It additionally did not initially launch Russell and the 11 automobiles between him and the chief.

Mercedes instructed Russell to overhaul the Security Automotive, though the British driver refrained, with no inexperienced gentle exhibiting to offer him confidence to take action.

One other hindrance was the actual fact marshals had been unable to maneuver Riccardo’s automotive, and a cherry picker solely began to recuperate it with three laps remaining.

Shortly after, Russell and the opposite automobiles had been allowed to make their well beyond the Security Automotive, however Verstappen solely acquired to his required place on the entrance of the Security Automotive queue on the finish of Lap 51 of 53.

Christian Horner admits they would have preferred Max Verstappen to win the race under normal racing regulations, rather than behind the Safety Car.

Please use Chrome browser for a extra accessible video participant

Christian Horner admits they’d have most well-liked Max Verstappen to win the race below regular racing laws, fairly than behind the Security Automotive.

Christian Horner admits they’d have most well-liked Max Verstappen to win the race below regular racing laws, fairly than behind the Security Automotive.

“At this level it turned clear there wasn’t going to be sufficient time for all of the automobiles to circle again round, be part of the prepare, after which launch the lapped automobiles to complete the race below inexperienced flag circumstances,” mentioned Sky Sports activities F1’s Karun Chandhok.

Verstappen and Leclerc had been cut up by two lapped automobiles – Yuki Tsunoda and Valtteri Bottas – on the penultimate lap, when the Monegasque was instructed earlier than the ultimate lap that this was how it will end.

That prompted cries of “come on, the monitor is evident” from Leclerc, and boos from the followers. Verstappen was additionally booed on the rostrum.

The FIA’s rationalization and the way it might have ended

Sky Sports activities F1’s Ted Kravitz revealed the reason from the FIA afterwards.

“They mentioned the marshals could not push it, that they had hoped to recuperate the automotive faster however doing that each one takes time,” he reported.

“Additionally they mentioned it is necessary to get the automobiles to bunch as much as permit the marshals area to recuperate Ricciardo’s automotive.

“If there’s a query, it is in regards to the misplaced Lap 50, why the inexperienced gentle was not proven earlier to Russell, particularly as his Mercedes group had been saying they suppose he can go by.”

Chandhok agreed that “procedurally, the Race Administrators did every little thing proper… they adopted the rulebook, no query about it” – however got here up with another state of affairs that may have given a greater end.

“My private view is that in gentle of what occurred in Abu Dhabi, if now we have an incident within the final 5 laps, it turns into an automated crimson flag with a standing begin,” he mentioned. “I believe for all of us, it was a bit of little bit of an anticlimactic end.”

Ted, in the meantime, concluded: “Was the Race Director taking part in it regular? Sure. May he have been faster? Sure.

“However was it a simply end in the way in which Abu Dhabi wasn’t? Sure.”

Leave a Comment